people who choose to live in cities constantly reference human thought and development, everything they do is in reference to other human beings, buildings streets and store-fronts designed by human beings reflect back. all of their natural experiences are mediated by other human beings, water is delivered in pipes made by humans, food is packaged and made available by other human beings, even parks are consciously designed and managed by other human beings. the common wildlife in cities, gulls, rats, squirrels, having adapted, reference human patterns more than natural cycles. the stars in the city shine dimly
i have struggled with the choice of where to live, living rurally feels like a better choice in many ways, being closer to natural cycles. when i lived rurally, i missed cafes, modern dance and running into random combinations of friends and acquaintenances on the street. someone in the country actually told me that i was, without a doubt, "a city girl", and not being sure what their evidence was, i've got to admit that it seems to be true
people often want to get out of cities, to "get back to nature", to remember natural cycles. there's an urge that happens less often for some, more often for others, to get "perspective". on the human project perhaps, and reflect its value in the larger picture?
i like the smell of the woods every day and the tides coming in and out of the harbour, these things are relaxing, reminding me that a frantic full-time city job is not worth it, no matter what i am getting paid, or how important other humans believe the work i am doing to be.
when i lived rurally, i was commuting to a city job four days a week, working on a small farm and relaxing the other days. this was hard on the head, not invested in the rhythms of the rural place, a visitor in the city. yet, it still seems like this is the necessary bridge, to bring these two very different experiences of life together
now contemplating alternating six months in a rural place and six months in a city, maybe this is too dramatic in its even split, but the idea is nagging, "you have to do both!", and somehow richly experience each way
cities need a lot of love and care, people living in cities are forgetting how to eat good food, how to recognize the sounds in the woods, how to take care of natural spaces in a collaborative way. can't avoid the challenge of urban sustainability, and lots of smart people are thinking about how it could happen:
http://www.livablecities.org/
http://www.icsc.ca/
http://www.unhabitat.org/wuf/2006/default.asp
>laura